That's a good opinion. I downloaded the browser to try. I wouldn't use it as my primary browser - both because I'm so dependent on Firefox plugins and I like using a more mainstream browser. It's enough effort to deal with the sites that require IE and don't work in Firefox. (and complain to companies that I won't use IE to buy their products and find alternates) I can't really fault sites for not working in Google. It's brand new. I am using Google's browser for a very specific use case. I plan to use 5 pages: mainly for two google applications (gmail and calendar) and a bit for editing 2 wiki pages and viewing another wiki page. I figure google pages will render very well in chrome. If there is nothing they are guaranteed to test, it's their own apps. I also have a couple of Google documents. I don't edit them often, but when I do, I may use chrome for the same reason.

i am accept stongly this blog... even me also propagating this in digital world...... "too much power in the hands of one organisation" really the google are raining as microsoft did before some years ago... microsoft must acquire yahoo and be the good competitor in web to the Gaints.