<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>







<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/">

  <channel rdf:about="http://radio.javaranch.com/ilja/">
    <title>Just My Thoughts</title>
    <link>http://radio.javaranch.com/ilja/</link>
    <description>Ilja on Software Development and more...</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        
        <rdf:li resource="http://radio.javaranch.com/ilja/2008/03/09/1205088855539.html" />
        
        <rdf:li resource="http://radio.javaranch.com/ilja/2008/02/27/1204145190205.html" />
        
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel>

  
  <item rdf:about="http://radio.javaranch.com/ilja/2008/03/09/1205088855539.html">
    <title>A Lightweight Appreciative Retrospection</title>
    <link>http://radio.javaranch.com/ilja/2008/03/09/1205088855539.html</link>
    
      
      
        <description>
          In December last year, our team had to meet a challenging business goal, and to meet it we changed quite a lot of our process. As the end of the year came close, we felt the desire to have some kind of reflection. We didn&#039;t feel the need for a fully fledged retrospective, though - instead, we wanted something lightweight and fun - and preferably something appreciative. I decided to try a variation of the Like To Like exercise as the main part. Here is how it went.&lt;/p&gt;
          &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://radio.javaranch.com/ilja/2008/03/09/1205088855539.html"&gt;Read more...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
        </description>
      
    
  </item>
  
  <item rdf:about="http://radio.javaranch.com/ilja/2008/02/27/1204145190205.html">
    <title>You *Are* Gonna Need A Good Design</title>
    <link>http://radio.javaranch.com/ilja/2008/02/27/1204145190205.html</link>
    
      
        <description>
          &lt;p&gt;
&#034;You ain&#039;t gonna need it!&#034; (short YAGNI) is one of the most popular, and probably also most misunderstood and misused mantras of Extreme Programming. Again and again I see it used as an excuse to not improve a design &#034;because it already works&#034;.
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I guess the following has already been stated in hundreds of places on the web and elsewhere, in some form or another - on the other hand I also think it can&#039;t be said too often:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&lt;B&gt;YAGNI applies to functionality, not design.&lt;/B&gt; All Agile approaches I know of are quite adamant about the fact that &lt;B&gt;you need a clean, well decoupled, cohesive, duplication-free, expressive and extensively tested design&lt;/b&gt; from the beginning. One that is optimized for the currently implemented (and needed) functionality.&lt;/p&gt;
        </description>
      
      
    
  </item>
  

</rdf:RDF>
