login
Blurts on the Art of Software Development

Today | RSS | RDF | Atom | Other Tags
Categories : All | All | CI | .NET | General | Humour | Java | Personal | Reviews | Ruby | SW Eng

Web Performance Inc. has published a very interesting report, which included a couple of surprises. Jetty pretty much sucked, JRun was one of the top guns, and Tomcat wasn't too far behind JRun.


Interesting to see the most expensive server in the test (Websphere) come in last... Of course without knowing who paid for the test the results don't tell a lot. Are they tweaked to favour one server over another? Was the application written specifically to use areas in which one server is known weak in order to pull it down?
The report does mention that WebSphere's performance improved significantly when they tweaked the setup... (but still couldn't catch the cheaper products)
I've been looking for an app server performance comparison for some time now. Maybe those folks that say Tomcat sucks and Jetty rules will change their tune. Via Lasse Koskela : Web Performance Inc. has published a very interesting report , whi

Read more...


Add a comment

Title
Body
HTML : b, i, blockquote, br, p, pre, a href="", ul, ol, li
Math Quiz 6 + 4 = (Helps stop blog spam)
Name
E-mail address
Website
Remember me Yes  No 

E-mail addresses are not publicly displayed, so please only leave your e-mail address if you would like to be notified when new comments are added to this blog entry (you can opt-out later).

TrackBack to http://radio.javaranch.com/lasse/addTrackBack.action?entry=1088756568000